Comments on: New knitting http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/ but not necessarily in that order Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:29:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Marsha http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11808 Marsha Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:04:05 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11808 @JD: I suspect that frogging laceweight alpaca is much more painful than frogging worsted wood. :) I haven't yet decided how I will do the hem for my Wallaby. I will definitely omit the ribbing at the bottom, but don't know yet if I will leave the curled stockinette or go back to pick up the stitches and create a straight hem (as I did on Sylvia's second Wallaby. Stay tuned! @JD: I suspect that frogging laceweight alpaca is much more painful than frogging worsted wood. :)

I haven’t yet decided how I will do the hem for my Wallaby. I will definitely omit the ribbing at the bottom, but don’t know yet if I will leave the curled stockinette or go back to pick up the stitches and create a straight hem (as I did on Sylvia’s second Wallaby. Stay tuned!

]]> By: JD http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11806 JD Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:53:05 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11806 Oh! I'm sorry about the frogging and knitting, it's the story of my life these days, too (except I am frogging laceweight alpaca)... I still remember the Wallaby you knit for S and how lovely I thought the rolled bottom hem was. Looking forward to seeing your FO! Oh! I’m sorry about the frogging and knitting, it’s the story of my life these days, too (except I am frogging laceweight alpaca)… I still remember the Wallaby you knit for S and how lovely I thought the rolled bottom hem was. Looking forward to seeing your FO!

]]> By: Deborah http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11742 Deborah Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:18:22 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11742 Boo about having to reknit those sleeves but you'll whip them out in no time. Sylvia just looks super adorable as usual. :-) BTW, I'm still working on tracking down those cat pictures. LOL Boo about having to reknit those sleeves but you’ll whip them out in no time. Sylvia just looks super adorable as usual. :-) BTW, I’m still working on tracking down those cat pictures. LOL

]]> By: Chris http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11712 Chris Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:26:05 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11712 Alas! Alas!

]]> By: Marsha http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11700 Marsha Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:21:25 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11700 Reknitting is no big deal--certainly not with these sleeves, which actually knit up pretty fast. At least I don't have to reknit the body of the sweater! Ned Flanders (on the left) agrees. When you push the button on his back he says, "Always room for one more Flanders!" but that's just code for "Knit it right, or else you'll never want to wear it and then where will you be?" Reknitting is no big deal–certainly not with these sleeves, which actually knit up pretty fast. At least I don’t have to reknit the body of the sweater!

Ned Flanders (on the left) agrees. When you push the button on his back he says, “Always room for one more Flanders!” but that’s just code for “Knit it right, or else you’ll never want to wear it and then where will you be?”

]]> By: Katie J http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11699 Katie J Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:42:38 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11699 Better to get it right, but sorry you have to knit it again. Better to get it right, but sorry you have to knit it again.

]]> By: Mark http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11695 Mark Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:52:44 +0000 http://first-things-first.net/2010/01/27/new-knitting/#comment-11695 Bummer. Looks cool, though. Bummer. Looks cool, though.

]]>